Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-structured review checklist with genuinely actionable directives and a crisp output contract. The main gap is the absence of any worked example or explicit completeness checkpoint, which keeps actionability and workflow clarity just below excellent.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line is a directive ("Remove buy/sell/hold/size recommendations", "Use read-only scopes by default") with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete named checks ("Keep `ITO_API_KEY` and venue API keys out of logs", "Require circuit breakers, spend limits, dry runs, and human approval") and an explicit five-item output contract make the guidance mostly executable, but there is no example finding or canonical output format to anchor the common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The review gates are clearly organized by category and the Output Contract anchors the result, but validation is implicit — there is no explicit checkpoint such as confirming every gate was reviewed before returning findings, and no ordering among gates. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is short with well-organized sections (Review Gates grouped by concern, then Output Contract) and no bundle files or external references are needed, which fits the rubric's exception for compact self-contained skills. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |