CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

strategic-compact

Suggests manual context compaction at logical intervals to preserve context through task phases rather than arbitrary auto-compaction.

53

Quality

60%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.kiro/skills/strategic-compact/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured and actionable with concrete config, decision tables, and risk-aware guidance, but is somewhat padded by tangential token-optimization material and time-sensitive version notes.

Suggestions

Move the 'Token Optimization Patterns' section into a separate reference file or trim it, since it largely covers general token hygiene unrelated to triggering strategic compaction.

Relocate the version-specific note about Claude Code 2.1.233 removing todo tools into a clearly marked 'Version notes' or 'Deprecated assumptions' section to satisfy time-sensitivity guidance.

Tighten the 'What Survives Compaction' table to only the non-obvious rows, assuming Claude already knows that files on disk and git state persist.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with concrete tables and code, but includes tangential 'Token Optimization Patterns' content and a long version-specific blockquote ('2.1.233 removed the todo/task tools') that isn't in a deprecated section, both of which could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready hook setup JSON, a concrete environment variable (COMPACT_THRESHOLD), a phase-transition decision table, and executable commands like '/compact Focus on implementing auth middleware next', with only minor gaps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequence via the decision guide table and Best Practices, with risk-aware checkpoints ('Write before compacting', 'write the plan to a file before compacting'); minor validation gaps keep it just below 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clearly headed sections with one-level-deep external references (the Longform Guide link, related skills); the inlined Token Optimization Patterns section is the main organization gap since no bundle files are present.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states what the skill does and carves out a distinct niche, but lacks an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause and only offers one concrete action with limited keyword variations.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when running long multi-phase sessions that approach context limits or before major task shifts.'

Expand concrete actions beyond 'suggests' (e.g., 'tracks tool calls, detects thresholds, reminds at intervals') to raise specificity.

Include more natural trigger terms users say, such as 'context limit', 'context full', '/compact', or 'long session'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (context compaction) and one concrete action ('Suggests manual context compaction at logical intervals'), but offers only a single action rather than a comprehensive list.

3 / 5

Completeness

Has a clear 'what' (suggests manual compaction at logical intervals) but the 'when' is only weakly implied ('at logical intervals', 'through task phases') with no explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, capping completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Contains relevant keywords ('context compaction', 'compact', 'auto-compaction') but misses common natural variations a user might say like 'context limit', 'context full', '/compact', or 'long session'.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (timing of manual compaction vs auto-compaction) with low conflict risk, though minor overlap exists with related context-management skills.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
affaan-m/ECC
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.