Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is a well-structured, actionable verification playbook with executable commands and clear stop-gates on the critical phases. The main weakness is uneven validation rigor across phases and slight redundancy in the framing sections.
Suggestions
Add explicit pass/fail gating to Phases 3-6 (e.g. 'If lint errors exceed N, STOP and fix') so every phase has a clear checkpoint.
Trim the redundant opening line and the 'Integration with Hooks' commentary to tighten token use.
Replace the 'X' placeholders in the report template with a short note on how to fill them, or reference the command output that populates each field.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean bash commands and short imperatives, with only minor redundancy such as the opening line repeating the description and the somewhat padded hooks section. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-pasteable commands for each phase (npm run build, npx --no-install tsc --noEmit, ruff check ., grep, git diff), with minor gaps like OR alternation and 'X' placeholders in the report template. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six verification phases are clearly sequenced with explicit stop-and-fix gates on build and types, though later phases (lint, security, diff review) only say 'report' and lack explicit validation checkpoints. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single self-contained file is well-organized into clear sections (When to Use, Verification Phases, Output Format, Continuous Mode, Integration) with no external references needed; at ~120 lines it sits just above the simple-skill threshold. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |