Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, highly actionable, and well-structured with a real one-level reference file. Its only weakness is workflow clarity: verification of batch dependency write-back is suggested rather than enforced as a mandatory validate→retry checkpoint, which the rubric caps at 2 for batch operations.
Suggestions
Promote the optional './gradlew :模块:dependencies' verification from a suggestion into a mandatory checkpoint in the workflow checklist, with an explicit validate→fix→retry loop after batch write-back.
Add an explicit post-write-back validation step (e.g., re-resolve affected GAVs and confirm the new version is artifact-resolvable) before declaring the upgrade complete.
Tie the write-back and validation steps together in the checklist so each upgraded library must pass a resolution check before the task is marked done.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Information-dense with no concept padding (no 'what is Gradle/a library' exposition); every section is purposeful — scope tables, concrete URL templates, write-back rules, and a copyable checklist. Not level 2 because the length is justified task content rather than unnecessary explanation that could be tightened away. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: full Maven Central Search API URL with parameters, maven-metadata.xml paths, GitHub release endpoints, and a write-back table specifying exact string/variable replacement. Not level 2 because the examples are executable and complete rather than pseudocode or missing key details. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The multi-step process is clearly sequenced (query order A–D, version strategy, write-back rules, copyable checklist), but verification is optional ('可建议用户本地做一次依赖解析验证...本 Skill不强制') rather than a mandatory validate→fix→retry checkpoint for batch write-back. Capped at 2 per the batch-operations feedback-loop guideline; not level 3 because the validation step is not an explicit enforced checkpoint. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a clear overview with a single, well-signaled one-level-deep reference ('更多 API 与示例见 [references/reference.md]'), and references/reference.md exists and holds URL templates/examples. Not level 2 because content is appropriately split and clearly signaled rather than inlined or poorly organized. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |