Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with concrete API templates, path rules, and a copyable workflow checklist. Its main weakness is validation: the destructive/batch dependency-editing workflow lacks a mandatory verification checkpoint with a feedback loop after write-back.
Suggestions
Promote the post-write validation into a mandatory checklist step with a feedback loop (e.g. run ./gradlew :module:dependencies, and if resolution fails, fix and re-run) rather than an optional suggestion to the user.
Remove the duplicated Maven Central / maven-metadata URL templates from the body, keeping them only in references/reference.md so the body stays a lean overview.
Tighten the 执行原则 list by merging near-duplicate items (e.g. 坐标变更 and 注释与链接 overlap with 同步写回) to reduce token cost.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Assumes Claude's competence (no basic concept explanations), uses compact tables, and keeps detail task-relevant; a few sections (执行 principles, duplicated API URLs) could be trimmed, so not fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete copy-paste URL templates (Maven Central Search, maven-metadata.xml, GitHub releases API), a write-back rules table, and a checklist; minor conditional hedging like '以实际坐标为准' prevents a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequenced query order and checklist exist, but post-write validation is optional ('可建议用户本地做一次依赖解析验证…不强制改 CI') with no enforceable validate→fix→retry loop for batch/destructive config edits, triggering the rubric cap. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with a clearly signaled one-level reference to the real references/reference.md for '更多 API 与示例'; some API URL templates are duplicated inline rather than living solely in the reference, a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |