Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured instruction-only review skill: lean rule catalog with concrete citations and executable checks, an explicitly sequenced process with a self-validation checkpoint, and a single well-signaled one-level-deep reference. It scores at the top anchor on all four dimensions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a dense rule catalog plus a phased process with no concept explanations Claude already knows (no "what is AOT" padding); each rule line carries an ID, severity, and citation, so every token earns its place. Not level 2 because there is no unnecessary explanation to tighten away. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable: rule IDs, severities, real repo citations, a verifiable command ("git grep \"Microsoft.AspNetCore\" -- sdks/dotnet/src must be empty"), and a copy-paste-ready review-summary template. Not level 2 because it is specific and copy-paste ready rather than pseudocode or abstract direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0–4 are explicitly sequenced with a dedicated Step 3 self-validation (dedupe, confirm real rule + real line, confirm correct file class, drop unverifiable) and a closing checklist. Not level 2 because validation checkpoints are explicit, not implicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that defers full BAD→GOOD examples and per-rule exceptions to a single clearly signaled one-level-deep reference, references/rules.md, which exists in the bundle. Not level 2 because the reference is well signaled and only one level deep. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |