Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted, dense instruction body: lean, repo-specific, with concrete wiring steps and an explicit Verify section. The two minor gaps are the prose-described server skeleton and the absence of an explicit error-recovery loop around the verify commands.
Suggestions
Add a short server Program.cs snippet next to the client snippet in 'Anatomy of a Step' so both project skeletons are copy-paste ready rather than prose-described.
Add one line to the Verify section telling the agent what to do on failure (fix and re-run the failing command, re-record the baseline if replay diverges) to close the feedback loop.
Name the integration-test csproj file explicitly (e.g. tests/AGUI.Hosting.AspNetCore.IntegrationTests/AGUI.Hosting.AspNetCore.IntegrationTests.csproj) in wiring step 2 so the ProjectReference edit target is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — dense, non-obvious guidance ('the parts agents forget', 'the IChatClient is the whole point', InternalsVisibleTo details) with no concept explanations or padding; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable: concrete csproj SDK types, exact paths, an executable client Program.cs snippet, and copy-paste dotnet build/test verify commands. Minor gap: the server Program.cs skeleton is described in prose ('calls builder.Services.AddAGUI()... ends with app.MapAGUI("/")') rather than shown as code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence (confirm next Step number, mirror the closest existing Step, 4-step wiring, Verify) with explicit validation commands and an anti-patterns checklist. Not 5: there is no explicit fix-and-retry feedback loop if a build, test, or end-to-end run fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and none are needed: the ~95-line body is well-organized into Anatomy, Wiring, Verify, Anti-patterns, and References, with clearly signaled one-level-deep routing references to sibling skills and no inlined content that belongs elsewhere. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |