Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable instruction-only skill: a clear workflow, an executable create example, and valuable agent-specific policy about the user-owned Editor surface. Its only weakness is slight redundancy between the intro and the practical-rules list, plus a missing edit/patch example.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence (no explanation of what Markdown is), with only a minor redundancy: the prefer-Markdown-over-ODT/DOCX guidance appears both in the opening paragraph and again as the first Practical rules bullet, which could be trimmed; this fits anchor 4 rather than the fully lean anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | An executable JSON text_editor example with an explicit .md path, concrete patch-vs-write edit guidance, and the specific open_in_canvas flag make the guidance mostly copy-paste ready; the minor gap is that the edit/patch path has no example, keeping it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step workflow (decide whether an artifact is useful, create with an explicit .md path, read-then-patch-or-write for edits, report the path) is clearly sequenced and unambiguous. Operations are neither destructive nor batch, so the validation cap does not apply, and the simple-skill exception allows a 5 for a single clearly-guided task. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines with well-organized sections (overview, workflow, example, practical rules) and no content that warrants external reference files; the simple-skill exception applies, so well-organized sections alone merit a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |