CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

add-domain

Add a new knowledge domain to your existing system. Derives domain-specific configuration through conversation, generates domain folders, templates, and vocabulary while preserving and connecting to your existing architecture.

60

Quality

71%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/add-domain/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, highly actionable multi-phase workflow with strong validation feedback loops and good reference hygiene; its only weakness is moderate verbosity in explanatory prose and rationale columns.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient procedural guidance, but ~430 lines include context-setting prose and 'Rationale' table columns that re-state reasoning Claude could infer, so it could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete, executable guidance throughout: real bash commands (mkdir, find/uniq -d, qmd), YAML schema blocks, and markdown templates the model can fill and emit directly.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Seven numbered phases are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (collision check, coherence check, kernel validation) and a user-approval feedback loop before generation.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A dedicated Reference Files section lists one-level-deep references each with a short purpose annotation, and detailed presets/transforms are offloaded to those files; the inline content is the workflow itself.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

57%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly conveys the skill's purpose and concrete actions, but uses second-person voice and omits an explicit 'Use when' trigger clause, leaving it just short of fully complete.

Suggestions

Rewrite in third person ('Adds a new knowledge domain...') to remove the second-person voice and recover the specificity score.

Append an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when adding a new knowledge domain or extending an existing notes/knowledge system with a second domain.'

Broaden trigger-term coverage with natural variations users might say (e.g. 'second domain', 'add a domain', 'extend my notes system').

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions ('Derives domain-specific configuration through conversation, generates domain folders, templates, and vocabulary'), which would anchor at 3, but the second-person phrasing ('your existing system', 'your existing architecture') triggers the voice penalty, reducing it by one level.

2 / 3

Completeness

The 'what' is clearly stated, but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 2 per the rubric.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant natural terms are present ('new knowledge domain', 'domain folders, templates, vocabulary') but coverage is thin with few common variations and no explicit trigger phrasing a user would echo.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is clear and specific to extending an existing knowledge system with a new domain, making it unlikely to trigger for the wrong skill.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
agenticnotetaking/arscontexta
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.