Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, well-organized procedural skill that communicates real operational knowledge (reuse-first orchestration, BYOM bundle semantics, memory contract rules, measured pitfalls) with exact tool names and parameters, and near-zero padding. Its consistent weakness is the last mile of executability: no complete example call payloads, no explicit failure-recovery steps, and a canonical external reference (INDEX.md) missing from the bundle.
Suggestions
Actionability: add one complete example invocation — e.g., a full argument payload for workforce.search_candidates and workforce.prepare_execution, or a sample redacted workorder — so the most common calls are copy-paste ready rather than name-plus-key-params.
Workflow clarity: add explicit recovery branches for the key failure points, e.g. 'if validate_selection rejects the redacted copy, resend the original federation result' and what to do when prepare_execution fails, turning the stated pitfalls into feedback loops.
Progressive disclosure: ship INDEX.md inside the skill bundle (or drop the link) — the body designates it as the canonical tool registry ('도구의 존재와 이름은 ... INDEX.md가 정본') but the file is absent from the skill directory.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — it teaches only non-obvious operational rules ("재사용으로 충분하면 모집하지 않는다", "없는 값을 지어내지 않는다") with no padding or re-explanation of known concepts. However, it inlines a specific date ("오너 결정 2026-08-09: 승인은 만들 때 한 번") that is trimmable time-sensitive information and is not placed in an old-patterns/deprecated section, which per the judging guidelines keeps it below the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: exact tool names with parameters are given throughout — "workforce.search_candidates" with "sourceScope=network", "workforce.validate_selection", "model.resolve_allocation" with the stage enum ("planner/worker/synthesis/verifier"), and near-copy-paste patterns like "hep-orch orchestrator=<tier|model> worker=<tier|model>" and "supersedes":"<h:16hex>". It falls short of anchor 5 because no complete example invocation (a full argument payload for search_candidates or prepare_execution, or a sample redacted workorder) is shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The orchestration section has a clear numbered sequence with checkpoints: roster reuse gate first ("workforce.goal_context" → "재사용으로 충분하면 모집하지 않는다"), then workorder → search → host selection → validate_selection → prepare_execution → auto-binding, plus a per-worker allocation step. It is not anchor 5 because feedback loops are implicit rather than explicit — e.g., "축약본은 거절됨" states that abbreviated copies of the federation result are rejected but never says what to do when rejection or prepare_execution failure occurs. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The file is well-sectioned (5 numbered domains plus a pitfalls section) and appropriately sized for a single-file skill, with its tool inventory deliberately delegated one level deep to [INDEX.md](INDEX.md) — clearly signaled. Scored against the actual bundle, however, INDEX.md is not present in the skill directory, so the one authoritative reference it points to dangles; this is a navigation gap that keeps it below anchor 5, though the in-bundle structure itself is good. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |