Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured routing skill with executable scripts, a clear step sequence, and explicit failure handling. It is slightly held back by conceptual prose that could be tighter and a few implicit checkpoints.
Suggestions
Tighten section 1.5 and the hard-rules section by converting prose into concrete, testable conditions to improve conciseness and actionability.
Add explicit validation feedback loops (e.g., what to do when workforce.validate_selection fails) rather than relying on the generic source_not_supported report.
Consider moving the runner-resolution fallback logic into a referenced script file to keep the body lean if the file is expected to grow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence, with executable scripts; section 1.5 and parts of sections 4-5 lean slightly conceptual and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable bash for runner resolution and auth plus a typed Workforce call sequence with parameters; minor gaps where behavior depends on external contracts the model cannot inspect. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence from resolve-runner through sign-in, staffing, and acting on the result, with validation checkpoints (report source_not_supported, never fall back to legacy paths); a couple of checkpoints are implicit rather than explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized numbered sections with no nested references and no bundle files inlined that belong elsewhere; no external files are referenced, but the structure is navigable. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |