Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A technically rigorous, well-sequenced workforce-staffing protocol with strong validation gates and concrete tooling. The main weakness is recurring prohibition restatement that could be condensed for token efficiency.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated 'fail closed / never fabricate / do not echo' prohibitions into a single boundary section and reference it, rather than restating them in sections 3, 6, and 7.
Add one fully filled example MCP call (realistic taskBrief/roles/edges values) alongside the signature-only sequence to lift actionability from signature to copy-paste-ready.
Consider moving the detailed execution-receipt field enumeration (section 7) and the model-allocation policy details (section 5) into reference files to reduce body length while keeping the workflow overview inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence (no basic-concept padding), but several boundary prohibitions recur across sections ('fail closed', 'never fabricate receipts', 'do not echo rejected values') and could be tightened without losing the protocol guarantees. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready bash runner-resolution block and an explicit ordered typed-MCP call sequence with named parameters and exact schema versions; minor gap is that tool-call bodies use '...' placeholders rather than literal filled examples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-7 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation gates (preflight protocol-version check, re-plan on rejection, digest recompute-and-fail-closed, receipt verification) and feedback loops for a binding/execution operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with descriptive headers and numbered steps in a single navigable file; no bundle files exist. At ~344 lines some receipt/model-policy detail could arguably split into a reference, but the workflow reads coherently inline. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |