CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

install-verification

Use when verifying that a generated agent package can be installed, discovered by runtimes, and checked without private dependencies.

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/install-verification/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is install-verification in agentlas-ai/Agentlas-OS

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A lean, highly actionable verification procedure with copy-paste-ready commands, an explicit file checklist, and a completion guard. The only notable gap is the absence of error-recovery guidance (what to do when a verify script fails) and an under-specified 'inspect' step.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Every line earns its place: variable setup ('Resolve ENGINE using /hep-build Step 0 and set PACKAGE_ROOT'), three exact bash commands, a concrete file checklist, and a one-line completion guard. There is no concept explanation or padding, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor exactly.

5 / 5

Actionability

The bash block is copy-paste ready with concrete variables, and the file list is explicit ('root AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md; .agents/; .claude/; scripts/install.sh'). It stops short of 5 because the 'inspect the generated package's selected adapters and install files' step gives no command or concrete criterion beyond file existence.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The sequence is clear — resolve ENGINE, run the three verification scripts, inspect required files, and a final guard ('Do not claim completion if any required file is missing'), with the scripts themselves serving as validation checkpoints. It is not 5 because there is no feedback loop instructing what to do when a verification script fails.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, with no bundle files and no content that warrants splitting into references. The body is well organized into a command block, a checklist, and a completion guard, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A solid description with a clear niche, concrete capabilities, and an explicit 'Use when...' clause. Its main weaknesses are thin trigger-term coverage (no synonyms or natural variations) and a 'when' clause that restates the task rather than naming a distinct moment.

Suggestions

Add natural trigger phrases and synonyms users would actually say, e.g. 'verify the generated package', 'install check', or 'public dependency check', to improve trigger term coverage.

Make the 'when' clause name a distinct triggering moment instead of restating the task, e.g. 'Use after generating an agent package to confirm it installs cleanly, is discovered by runtimes, and has no private dependencies.'

Clarify what 'checked' means (e.g., 'passes a public/private dependency safety check') so the third capability is as concrete as the first two.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists three concrete capabilities — 'can be installed, discovered by runtimes, and checked without private dependencies' — which matches the anchor for several specific actions with minor gaps. It is not a 5 because 'checked' is underspecified compared to the other two actions, leaving a small coverage gap.

4 / 5

Completeness

Both 'what' (verifying installability, runtime discovery, and private-dependency safety) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when...' clause) are present. It does not reach 5 because the 'when' essentially restates the 'what' instead of naming a distinct triggering moment (e.g., 'after generating an agent package'), so the trigger could be more explicit.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant keywords are present ('verifying', 'generated agent package', 'installed'), but 'discovered by runtimes' leans technical rather than user-natural, and common variations or synonyms such as 'verify install', 'install check', or 'package verification' are absent — the anchor for some relevant keywords missing common variations. It falls short of 4 because keyword coverage is not yet 'good' with only a few missing natural terms.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Generated agent package' carves a mostly distinct niche with clear triggers, matching the anchor for mostly distinct with minor overlap risk. It is not a 5 because generic terms like 'installed' and 'checked' leave minor overlap risk with general packaging or verification skills.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

agentlas-ai/Agentlas-OS

Path

.agents/skills/install-verification/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.