Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-structured with concrete, sequenced governance directives and a blocking promotion gate plus reporting checklist. Its only gaps are the lack of example artifact schemas and an explicit retry/feedback loop on the promotion gate.
Suggestions
Add a brief example of the expected structure for `.agentlas/skill-registry.json` (a few JSON lines) so the directives are copy-paste ready.
Turn the step-8 promotion gate into an explicit feedback loop (e.g. 'Block promotion; remediate the missing evidence; re-check before proceeding').
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: a short orienting line plus nine terse directives and a compact output checklist, with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows and no padding, so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Directives are concrete and specific (named paths like `.agentlas/skill-registry.json`, field values like `tier: candidate`, and flag `runtimeFirstClassRecallEnabled: false`), but no example schemas or sample file contents are given, leaving a minor gap for an instruction-only skill. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear nine-step sequence is present with a promotion-blocking gate (step 8) and an output section that reports evidence gaps and rollback status, but there is no explicit validate-then-fix-then-retry feedback loop, which keeps it below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is well under 50 lines, has no external bundle files, and is cleanly organized into a Procedure section and an Output section, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |