Conciseness

The procedure is a lean numbered list with minimal padding, though step 9b includes explanatory prose about older spellings and drift that could be trimmed slightly.

Actionability

Concrete file paths, a runnable verify script, and an explicit manifest.json example make most steps executable; a few steps (e.g. 'Encode handoff and return contracts') remain high-level without a template.

Workflow Clarity

An explicitly numbered sequence with a validation checkpoint (run scripts/verify-team-package.sh before reporting completed, and correct-or-collapse guidance on failure) provides clear feedback loops for a batch/destructive packaging operation.

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-sectioned into Procedure and Output with named reference files (builder-interview-research-gate.md, docs/*, manifest.json), but references are plain paths rather than clearly signaled one-level-deep links, and the docs files are not bundled here.

Specificity

Enumerates concrete artifacts and roles — orchestrator, PM Soul, Memory Curator, Policy Gate, workers, eval, QA, handoffs, runtime adapters — giving comprehensive, specific actions rather than vague language.

Completeness

The 'Use when' clause explicitly states the trigger and the 'what' lists the package components, but the 'when' is a single bundled condition rather than multiple concrete trigger phrases.

Trigger Term Quality

The phrase 'generating or auditing a multi-role agent team package' is domain-accurate but technical; it lacks common synonyms or natural phrasings a user would say, leaning on jargon like 'orchestrator' and 'Policy Gate'.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'multi-role agent team package' niche with named components (PM Soul, Memory Curator, Policy Gate) is highly specific and unlikely to collide with unrelated skills.