CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

file-sharing

Use before direct filesync calls, reading non-task shared files, pushing mid-task progress, or troubleshooting missing shared files. Do not use for normal task acceptance or submission; taskflow ack_task and submit_task handle lifecycle sync internally.

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, fully executable instruction skill: concrete payloads and commands, a numbered troubleshooting flow with escalation, and well-organized sections that all earn their place. The only improvement is trimming minor redundancy in the forbidden-path list and repeated absolute-path prohibition.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and directive throughout — no concept explanations, every line instructs. Not 5 due to minor trim opportunities: the forbidden-path list includes '/root/agentteams-fs/agents/...' which is already covered by '/root/agentteams-fs/...', and the absolute-path prohibition appears in both the paths section and the closing troubleshooting note.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable: copy-paste-ready JSON payloads for pull and push (including an exclude example), exact 'pwd' / 'ls -la shared/tasks/{task-id}/' commands, and an exact escalation message template — covering the common pull, push, and missing-file cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The missing-files flow is a numbered sequence with explicit checkpoints (pull, verify pwd and local path) and a feedback loop that escalates to the coordinator with the filesync outcome, plus clear rules for the pull/push cases. Simple, single-purpose skill with unambiguous actions; no destructive or batch operations requiring validation caps.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Single-file skill under ~70 lines with no bundle files (no references/, scripts/, or assets/); content is compact enough to belong inline and is organized into clearly headed sections (Local Paths, Task Lifecycle Sync, Non-Task Shared Files, If You Cannot Find Files), matching the simple-skill exception for well-organized single-file skills.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A trigger-focused description with strong negative boundary guidance and good natural keyword coverage, but it never states what the skill itself provides, leaving the 'what' implicit. Adding one explicit capability sentence would lift it to the top band.

Suggestions

Open with an explicit 'what' statement, e.g. 'Manages syncing of shared files between agents via the filesync tool (pull, push, path conventions)' before the trigger clauses.

Add common user phrasings as trigger synonyms, such as 'pull', 'sync', or 'when shared files are not found', to broaden natural-term coverage.

State where the skill's detailed path rules live (or that they are all in this skill) so the description also signals the skill's content, not just its triggers.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete trigger actions — 'direct filesync calls, reading non-task shared files, pushing mid-task progress, or troubleshooting missing shared files' — tied to a named tool. Not 5 because the actual capabilities (pull, push, path conventions) are only implied, not enumerated.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'when' is explicit and rich (multiple positive triggers plus a negative boundary), but the 'what' — what the skill actually does or contains — is never stated, only implied via tool names. Falls between anchor 2 (only 'when' present) and anchor 4 (both explicit); per the guideline to score only what is explicitly stated, the implicit 'what' cannot be credited.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural-term coverage: 'filesync', 'shared files', 'mid-task progress', 'missing shared files', 'task acceptance', 'submission'. Not 5 because common variations like 'pull', 'sync', or 'can't find files' phrasings are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (shared-file syncing via the filesync tool) with an explicit negative boundary — 'Do not use for normal task acceptance or submission; taskflow ack_task and submit_task handle lifecycle sync internally' — that directly prevents overlap with the closely related taskflow lifecycle. Minimal conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

agentscope-ai/AgentTeams

Path

manager/agent/copaw-worker-agent/skills/file-sharing/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.