Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean overview with strong progressive disclosure and good command-level actionability. The main gap is workflow clarity: the two-way sync sequences are implicit, and the destructive mc mirror --overwrite batch operation lacks validation/verification steps, capping that dimension at 3.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation checkpoints for the destructive/batch operations, e.g., after 'mc mirror ... --overwrite' pull, verify the expected file exists/has a fresh mtime before reading.
Promote the implicit gotcha ordering into a short numbered workflow (write -> push -> @mention; Worker reports -> pull -> read) so the sequence is explicit.
Inline one complete example command (e.g., the single-file pull with ${AGENTTEAMS_STORAGE_PREFIX}) in the body to make guidance fully copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~20-line body is lean: every bullet is a non-obvious gotcha or command fact ('Local /root/agentteams-fs/ is NOT real-time synced', 'mc mirror uses --overwrite; single file uses mc cp') with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. This matches anchor 5 ('every token earns its place'); a 4 would require noticeable over-explanation, which is absent. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable facts are present (mc mirror with --overwrite, mc cp for single files, @mention notification, exact local path), matching anchor 4. Not 5 because the full copy-paste command syntax (e.g., the ${AGENTTEAMS_STORAGE_PREFIX} forms) lives in references/sync-guide.md rather than the body, and not 3 because the guidance given is real and specific, not pseudocode. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The push-then-notify and pull-before-read sequences are present but implicit in gotcha bullets rather than an ordered workflow, and the destructive batch operation (mc mirror --overwrite) has no validation or verification checkpoint — the rubric's cap for destructive/batch operations without validation applies. Above 3 would require explicit checkpoints such as verifying the pulled file before reading. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview with two well-organized sections and one clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/sync-guide.md, verified to exist) routed via a situation-to-file table — a direct match for anchor 5. No nested references and no bulk content inlined that belongs in a separate file. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |