Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable skill body with executable commands and a clearly sequenced coordinator-notification workflow. Its main gap is the absence of a validation/feedback loop for the discovery step (e.g., verifying a tool call succeeds before confirming readiness).
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the workflow — e.g., a sample `mcporter call <server>.<tool>` round-trip to confirm the new server works before confirming readiness to the coordinator.
Add brief error-recovery guidance for common failures (server not in list, 403/401, command not found) so Claude can self-correct without guessing.
Consider extracting the example SKILL.md template into a reference file so the main body stays a lean overview pointing to the detailed pattern.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — commands in tight code blocks, no padding explaining what MCP or CLI tools are, and every section earns its place, assuming Claude's competence throughout. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste ready `mcporter list`/`call` examples covering both key=value and JSON arg syntax, real config paths, and an install fallback — fully executable guidance for the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–4 are clearly sequenced with a confirmation checkpoint (Step 4), but there is no error-recovery feedback loop (e.g., what to do if `mcporter list` fails or a server is missing); the workflow is non-destructive so the cap-at-3 rule does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file structure with clear section headers (Commands, workflow, notes) and easy navigation; no bundle files exist so references are unnecessary, though the embedded example SKILL.md template is slightly long enough to merit being its own reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |