CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

organization

Use before any Leader action that depends on current team topology, worker list, worker phase, runtime, room ID, Matrix ID, Team Admin, human identity, or lifecycle state. Always use this skill when assigning tasks, sending cross-room messages, recovering projects, handling heartbeat, waking/sleeping workers, or when any worker/room/identity value might be stale.

75

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A lean, executable, well-sequenced skill body with explicit validation checkpoints and clean section organization, scoring top marks across all content dimensions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~40-line body assumes Claude's competence, skips concept padding, and lets every line carry actionable guidance, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor; not a 2 because there is no unnecessary explanation to tighten.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable agt CLI commands with a real shell-variable pattern (e.g., 'agt get workers ... -o json | jq -r ".team"' and 'agt worker ensure-ready --name <worker-name> --team "$TEAM_CR"'), matching the copy-paste-ready anchor; the <worker-name> placeholder is justified, not pseudocode.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequence (resolve Team CR -> read CLI fields -> use room IDs -> lifecycle after checking files) with an explicit validation checkpoint ('If CLI output is missing a required room ID or Matrix ID, stop and report a metadata problem. Do not guess.'), matching the explicit-checkpoints anchor; not a 2 because validation is stated, not implicit.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with no external references needed and well-organized sections (Source Of Truth, What To Read From CLI, Lifecycle), meeting the simple-skill allowance for a 3; no bundle files exist to verify against.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A specific, well-triggered description with explicit 'when' guidance and a clear niche, weakened only by jargon-heavy trigger terms that reduce natural-keyword breadth.

Suggestions

Add a few plain-language trigger synonyms alongside the jargon (e.g., 'team setup', 'worker status', 'messaging workers') so users phrase the need more naturally.

Lead with a concise capability statement ('Resolves current AgentTeams team topology and worker runtime state via the agt CLI') before the trigger clauses to sharpen the 'what'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions ('assigning tasks, sending cross-room messages, recovering projects, handling heartbeat, waking/sleeping workers') and specific state fields (room ID, Matrix ID, worker phase), matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor; not a 2 because coverage is comprehensive rather than partial.

3 / 3

Completeness

Two explicit trigger clauses ('Use before any Leader action that depends on...', 'Always use this skill when...') clearly answer when, and the enumerated actions and state fields answer what, meeting the explicit-both anchor; not a 2 because the 'when' is explicit rather than implied.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Trigger phrases like 'assigning tasks' and 'waking/sleeping workers' are natural for this system's users, but the description leans heavily on internal jargon ('Matrix ID', 'heartbeat', 'worker phase') and lacks common-variation breadth, so it sits at the 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' level rather than full coverage.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Triggers are tightly scoped to AgentTeams/Matrix organization management, giving it a clear niche that is unlikely to fire for unrelated skills; not a 2 because the specificity leaves little overlap with similar skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
agentscope-ai/AgentTeams
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.