Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear sequenced protocol and real backing scripts, losing points mainly to redundant restatement of the script commands and a missing recovery path when a marker is active.
Suggestions
Collapse the 'Scripts' section into a short reference table (script, args, exit codes) and remove the command blocks already shown in the protocol to cut redundancy.
Add a brief recovery step for the active-marker case (e.g., wait for expiration, then re-check) so the workflow has an explicit feedback loop.
Trim the 'Best Practices' list to items not already implied by the numbered protocol.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with no generic concept padding, but the 'Scripts' section restates the same commands already shown in the 'Coordination Protocol', and 'Best Practices' partly reiterates the protocol steps. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: copy-paste bash commands with absolute paths, a concrete marker JSON format, exit-code semantics, and three real scripts in the bundle that match the referenced paths. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequence with a validation checkpoint (check marker, exit 1 = do not modify); the gap is that it states 'do NOT modify' but gives no retry/backoff guidance for the active-marker case. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with the protocol and marker format inline and script implementations correctly offloaded to one-level-deep files in scripts/; minor gap is the duplicated script-usage block. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |