Conciseness

Every one of the ~30 lines is system-specific operational knowledge Claude could not know elsewhere: "Always use `manage-state.sh`... never edit manually with jq", "Never @mention a Worker after recording infinite task execution — this creates a rapid-fire loop... that burns tokens". There is no filler, no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and each gotcha pairs the rule with its failure consequence. This matches the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor.

Actionability

The gotchas give concrete, executable directives with exact file names, tools, and orderings: "Always push task files to MinIO before notifying Worker", "Read SOUL.md before composing notifications", "include a suggestion to use `find-skills`". However, the body never shows how to actually invoke the scripts it names (e.g., no `scripts/manage-state.sh` usage example) — invocation detail is deferred to references — which leaves minor gaps versus copy-paste-ready guidance.

Workflow Clarity

The body provides routing rules and an excellent situation-to-doc table, but no sequenced end-to-end workflow — the actual step sequences live in the reference files, and the body's implicit order (select worker → register in state.json → push to MinIO → notify → pull results) is scattered across gotchas rather than presented as a sequence. There are also no validation/checkpoint steps in the body itself for risky operations (state modification, task registration), matching the 'sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit' anchor.

Progressive Disclosure

Scored against the actual bundle: all four referenced files (`references/worker-selection.md`, `finite-tasks.md`, `infinite-tasks.md`, `state-management.md`) exist and match the routing table exactly, and the "Read the relevant doc before executing. Do not load all of them" instruction is exemplary disclosure signaling. It falls short of a 5 because references are not strictly one level deep — `finite-tasks.md` points to `infinite-tasks.md`, `worker-selection.md` points to `team-management/references/team-task-delegation.md`, and `infinite-tasks.md` references a HEARTBEAT.md outside this bundle — a minor second-hop organization gap.

Specificity

The description names the domain ("delegate to a Worker", "recurring scheduled tasks", "check worker availability") and implies several concrete actions, but every clause is a trigger condition — no explicit statement of what the skill actually does, leaving coverage of its capabilities implied rather than listed. It sits above the score-2 anchor ('names domain but actions minimal') because the trigger clauses carry real action content, but below score 4, which expects several specific actions explicitly listed.

Completeness

The 'when' is strong — an explicit "Use when" clause with four concrete triggers — but the 'what' is never stated; the skill's function (managing delegation of tasks to Workers) is only inferable from the triggers. This is above score 2 ("only 'when' present without 'what'", e.g., "Use when working with documents") because the when-clauses embed actions, but below score 4, which requires both an explicit what and when.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases a user would say are well covered: "admin gives a task", "Worker reports task completion", "recurring scheduled tasks", "check worker availability". A few natural variations are missing (e.g., 'assign a task', 'worker finished/done', 'task status'), so it does not reach the comprehensive-with-synonyms level of score 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The Worker-delegation domain is a clear niche with distinct triggers, unlikely to fire for unrelated skills. Minor overlap risk remains with closely related skills (e.g., a heartbeat/scheduling skill for "recurring scheduled tasks" or a worker-status skill for "check worker availability"), which keeps it below score 5.