Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-structured with specific tool guidance, but lacks a complete invocation example and an explicit validation feedback loop, capping actionability and workflow clarity at 2.
Suggestions
Add a concrete invocation example for 'roomflow create_task_room' showing the argument structure (projectId, source metadata, worker user IDs) so the guidance is copy-paste ready.
Insert an explicit validation checkpoint after 'roomflow describe_room' (e.g. confirm the returned classification before proceeding to create_task_room) with a retry on mismatch.
Clarify the handoff sequence end-to-end (create task room → use returned room for project state → delegate to Workers) as a numbered checklist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and instruction-focused with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete tool names and parameters are given ('roomflow create_task_room', 'projectId', DingTalk 'sourceRoomId' and 'sender', Worker Matrix user IDs), but no complete invocation template or argument-structure example is shown, leaving the guidance executable in intent but incomplete in form. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear two-phase sequence (describe → create/reuse) with classification criteria is present, but there is no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop, so checkpoints remain implicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, has no bundle files requiring references, and is organized into well-signaled sections ('## Describe Room', '## Create Or Reuse Task Room'), satisfying the simple-skill rule for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |