Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured coordination playbook: concrete checklists, decision points, and prohibitions with almost no token waste. Its main gaps are mild cross-section redundancy and the absence of a single enumerated end-to-end workflow or worked example.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated single-owner rule into one section and cross-reference it from the others to reclaim a few tokens.
Add one short worked example of a dispatch message and the subsequent accept-or-revise decision to make the check_task flow concrete.
Optionally state the leader workflow as an ordered list (clarify -> choose mode -> bound tasks -> dispatch -> decide -> report) so the sequence is explicit rather than implied by section order.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, imperative bullets with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Not 5 because the same rules are stated two to three times across sections (single-owner conflicts appear in the intro, 'Good Task Boundaries', and 'Patch Rules'; 'report accepted outcomes' is also repeated). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable instruction-only guidance: an explicit pre-delegation checklist, a five-option decision list after check_task, the deliverable path 'shared/tasks/{task-id}/', and explicit prohibitions. Not 5 because there are no worked examples (e.g. a sample dispatch or acceptance decision) and 'check_task' is assumed known. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The leader workflow is sequenced through the sections (clarify, choose mode, bound tasks, dispatch, decide on results) with an explicit post-completion decision checkpoint. Not 5 because the end-to-end order is implicit in section layout rather than enumerated, and error-recovery paths after a rejected result are only sketched. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed — the body contains only decision guidance, not bulk reference material that should be split out. Sections are well-organized with clear headers, no nested references, and easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |