Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured instruction set that respects Claude's intelligence and gives concrete coordination rules, with only minor gaps in executable primitives and an explicit post-check validation loop.
Suggestions
Add an explicit 'after check_task, validate the deliverable against the acceptance criteria before accepting' feedback-loop step to strengthen the result-decision checkpoint.
Where concrete primitives exist (e.g. task IDs, node states), include a one-line example of the accept/revise command or state transition to make guidance directly executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, imperative guidance with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific instructions (deliverables in `shared/tasks/{task-id}/`, ready-node resolution, accept/revise/verifier decisions) but no executable command or code examples for the coordination primitives. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced decision flow (clarify before delegation, choose mode, bound tasks, decide result) with an explicit result-decision checkpoint; minor gap is the lack of an explicit validation/feedback-loop step after `check_task`. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into focused sections of appropriate length with no bundle files needed; structure is clear and navigable, though there are no one-level-deep references because none are required. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |