Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-sequenced, largely executable Q&A workflow with a sensible fallback chain, weakened by verbose transitional prose, one broken find command, and no use of bundle files for the sizable inline shell logic. Tightening narration and extracting the path-resolution scripts would raise conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Fix the working-directory search command to `find . \( -name "faq.en.md" -o -name "config.zh.md" \) -type f | head -n 1` so it is actually executable as written.
Move the Step 1 path-resolution logic (the QWENPAW_ROOT deduction and fuzzy search blocks) into a scripts/resolve_docs_dir.sh and reference it from one line, reducing inline shell bulk and improving progressive disclosure.
Cut the transitional narration ("If there is no documentation directory in memory, continue with the following logic", "Run the following script logic to obtain the variable $QWENPAW_ROOT") since the surrounding conditionals and comments already convey the fallback order, and add a verification step that the matched document's topic actually corresponds to the question before answering.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The fallback chain is padded with narration restating what the adjacent commands already show ("If there is no documentation directory in memory, continue with the following logic", "Run the following script logic to obtain the variable $QWENPAW_ROOT"), fitting the anchor 'mostly efficient but some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' rather than anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly executable with concrete commands (python3 constant import, $QWENPAW_ROOT deduction via which/whereis, find over $DOCS_DIR), but one snippet is broken as written: `find . -type f -name "faq.en.md" -o name "config.zh.md"` is missing the second `-name` and has the classic `-o` precedence bug, so it fits 'mostly executable... minor gaps' rather than anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with an explicit fallback order and per-step checkpoints (skip-to-Step-2 guard, existence checks, Step 5 as final website fallback). It falls short of anchor 5 because there is no verify-then-retry loop confirming that a located document actually answers the question before responding. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the ~135-line body is fully inline; the multi-block path-resolution shell logic naturally belongs in a scripts/ file, and the skill exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception. Section headers are well organized, but 'content that should be separate is inline' matches anchor 3 better than anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |