Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-organized debugging process with a clear sequence and validation checkpoint. The main gap is actionability: it gives specific directives but no concrete worked example or executable snippet to anchor the guidance.
Suggestions
Add a minimal concrete example for one step, such as a one-line repro command or a git bisect snippet, to make the guidance copy-paste ready.
Show a brief hypothesis/test pairing (e.g., 'Hypothesis: off-by-one in loop bounds → test with input len=0') to demonstrate the falsifiable-hypothesis step concretely.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~16-line body is lean, assumes Claude's competence, and never pads with definitions of debugging concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Steps are concrete imperatives and name specific tools, but there is no worked example or executable command beyond generically listing tools, so it stops short of copy-paste-ready guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered six-step sequence with an explicit 'Verify' checkpoint and an inherent hypothesis/test feedback loop; the final step re-runs failing and related tests. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short single-purpose skill organized into three clean sections (Process, Useful tools, Anti-patterns) with no need for external references, meeting the simple-skill allowance for the top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |