Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers strong, executable code examples and concrete commands, but is weighed down by verbose generic boilerplate, redundant sections, and dead reference paths. Tightening the prose and fixing the missing references would substantially improve it.
Suggestions
Remove the generic boilerplate sections (Quality Checklist, Output Requirements, Output Contract, Failure Handling, User Checkpoints, Quick Validation) that restate knowledge Claude already has, and merge the two 'When to Use' and two 'References' sections into single, concise versions.
Fix progressive disclosure by either creating the referenced references/guide.md, references/examples/, and references/api-docs/ files or removing those dead links, keeping only references/audit-reference.md which exists.
Add an explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop to the Workflow (e.g., after equity/dispute analysis, re-check issues and only proceed when resolved) to lift workflow clarity above a 2.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is padded with generic boilerplate Claude already knows (Quality Checklist, Output Requirements, Error Handling, Output Contract, Failure Handling, User Checkpoints, Quick Validation) and has redundant duplicate 'When to Use' and 'References' sections, matching the 'mostly efficient but includes unnecessary explanation' anchor rather than a lean score-3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides multiple complete, executable Python examples (AuthorshipCreditGenerator with weighted criteria, CRediT role mapping, equity analysis) and concrete CLI commands like 'python scripts/main.py --contributions contributions.json --guidelines ICMJE --output authorship_order.json', matching the 'fully executable, copy-paste ready' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Workflow section lists five sequenced steps with an early-stop validation (step 2) and a fallback path (step 5), but checkpoints are implicit and there is no explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop for the equity/dispute checking, matching the 'steps listed but validation gaps' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure exists with a valid one-level reference (references/audit-reference.md), but the first References section points to references/guide.md, references/examples/, and references/api-docs/ that do not exist, and inline boilerplate that should be separate keeps it at the 'some structure but could be better organized' anchor rather than a clean score-3. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |