biotech-pitch-deck-narrative

Use biotech-pitch-deck-narrative for academic writing workflows that need structured investor-facing storytelling, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.

Quality

67%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./scientific-skills/Academic Writing/biotech-pitch-deck-narrative/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured with concrete executable commands, a clear sequenced workflow, and a signaled reference file. Its main weaknesses are redundancy, padded meta-content, and a heavy monolithic SKILL.md that could offload more to references.

Suggestions

De-duplicate the compile/help commands (present in both Quick Check and Audit-Ready Commands) and consolidate Example Usage with the Example section.

Move meta-content such as Risk Assessment, Security Checklist, Evaluation Criteria, and Lifecycle Status into references/ to slim SKILL.md toward an overview.

Remove or refresh the stale 'Next Review Date: 2026-03-20' so time-sensitive metadata does not read as current guidance.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly efficient but includes redundancy (py_compile appears in both Quick Check and Audit-Ready Commands; Example Usage overlaps Example) and padded meta-content, plus a stale 'Next Review Date: 2026-03-20'.	2 / 3
Actionability	Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands (python -m py_compile scripts/main.py, python scripts/main.py --help, --stage series-a --audience biotech-specialist) and a specific parameters table, matching the 'fully executable commands; copy-paste ready' anchor.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The Workflow section gives five sequenced steps with an explicit checkpoint ('If scientific support or market context is missing, stop and request the minimum additional inputs') plus checklists, matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps' anchor.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The reference (references/audit-reference.md) is one level deep and clearly signaled, but SKILL.md carries substantial inline meta-content (Risk Assessment, Security Checklist, Evaluation Criteria, Lifecycle Status) that could be split out, and audit commands are duplicated across the two files.	2 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Description

57%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description targets a distinct niche and includes an explicit trigger clause, but it frames capabilities as output qualities rather than concrete actions and omits common trigger variations. It is solid but not exemplary.

Suggestions

Replace output-quality phrasing with concrete actions, e.g. 'Drafts and rewrites biotech pitch deck sections, scaffolds investor Q&A, and structures fundraising narratives.'

Add natural trigger terms users would say, such as 'fundraising', 'pitch deck', 'seed deck', or 'investor narrative'.

Lead with the 'what' (concrete actions) before the 'when' trigger so both halves are explicit.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain and output qualities ("structured investor-facing storytelling, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries") but lists attributes of the output rather than concrete actions, fitting the 'names domain and some actions' anchor.	2 / 3
Completeness	A trigger clause is present ("Use ... for academic writing workflows that need ..."), but the "what" is expressed as output qualities rather than concrete actions, so it does not clearly answer both what and when at the highest level.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes relevant terms like "biotech-pitch-deck-narrative" and "investor-facing storytelling" but misses common variations a user might say such as "fundraising", "pitch", or "seed deck", matching the 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' anchor.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The biotech fundraising pitch-deck niche with investor-facing storytelling triggers is clearly distinct and unlikely to conflict with unrelated skills, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers' anchor.	3 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: aipoch/medical-research-skills
Commit: 7cc5680

Reviewed: 3 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.