Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is genuinely actionable with real commands and well-organized references, but it is inflated with generic template boilerplate that is unrelated to — and sometimes contradictory with — the medical discharge-summary purpose. The workflow is present but generic rather than task-specific.
Suggestions
Remove or rewrite the off-domain boilerplate: the "When to Use" academic-writing bullet and the Required Inputs table referencing research questions, PMIDs, PDFs, and CSVs do not fit a hospital discharge-summary skill.
Replace the generic 5-step Workflow with a discharge-specific sequence (ingest patient JSON → map sections per template → render via scripts/main.py → verify required sections present), with explicit validation checkpoints.
Tighten the body by collapsing the many overlapping meta-sections (Output Requirements, Output Contract, Response Template, Failure Handling, Error Handling) into one concise guidance block to reduce token load.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Useful efficient content exists (parameters table, input JSON, executable commands), but the body is padded with large generic boilerplate sections irrelevant to the medical domain — e.g. "Use this skill for academic writing tasks" and a Required Inputs table listing "Research question... PMID, PDF, CSV, DOCX, keywords". | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands ("python scripts/main.py --input patient_data.json --output discharge_summary.md --format standard", "python -m py_compile scripts/main.py"), a real bundled script, a parameters table, and a full input JSON schema give copy-paste-ready guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A 5-step Workflow and a Quick Check are present, but the steps are generic template language ("Confirm the user objective", "Validate that the request matches the documented scope") rather than a task-specific sequence, and validation checkpoints for the actual generation are only implicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are clearly signaled and one level deep ("references/discharge_template.md", "references/medical_terms.json", "references/section_guidelines.md"), and all three are real bundle files, giving clean navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |