Content
53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content has solid actionable command/parameter guidance and real bundled references, but is weighed down by extensive generic process boilerplate that inflates token cost without adding figure-legend-specific knowledge. Tightening the workflow into concrete validation checkpoints and removing redundant gating sections would materially improve it.
Suggestions
Remove or consolidate the generic boilerplate sections (Output Requirements, Response Template, Input Validation, Failure Handling, User Checkpoints, Output Contract, Security Checklist, Risk Assessment, Evaluation Criteria, Lifecycle Status) that restate knowledge Claude already has.
Rewrite the Workflow as a concrete, sequenced recipe with an explicit validate->fix->retry loop for legend generation, instead of abstract gating prose.
Fix the malformed example ('python scripts/main.py --image.png --type scatter --language zh') to use '--input image.png', and either add the missing requirements.txt or drop the 'pip install -r requirements.txt' reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is noticeably verbose, padding SKILL.md with generic boilerplate sections (Output Requirements, Response Template, Input Validation, Failure Handling, User Checkpoints, Output Contract, Security Checklist, Risk Assessment, Evaluation Criteria, Lifecycle Status) that restate process knowledge Claude already has rather than figure-legend specifics. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable usage ('python scripts/main.py --input <image_path> --type <chart_type>'), a real parameter table, and working examples tied to the bundled script, with only minor gaps such as the malformed '--image.png' example missing '--input'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A sequence exists, but the Workflow steps are abstract gating prose rather than a concrete recipe, and the core generation operation lacks an explicit validate->fix->retry loop; the batch/destructive cap (User Checkpoints mention batch processing) holds this at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are one level deep and clearly signaled to real bundle files (references/legend_templates.md, references/academic_style_guide.md, scripts/main.py), but substantial generic boilerplate is inlined in SKILL.md rather than split out, and the referenced requirements.txt does not exist. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |