Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured skill with a real executable script and genuine reference file, clear workflow and validation rules, and appropriate progressive disclosure. The main weakness is redundancy across several generic process sections that pads token use.
Suggestions
Consolidate the overlapping 'When to Use', 'Key Features', 'Example Usage', 'Implementation Details', 'Required Inputs', and 'Recommended Workflow' sections, which repeat the same validate-then-execute-then-review guidance; keep one concrete workflow and remove the generic restatements to improve conciseness.
Add an explicit feedback loop to the workflow (e.g., on API error or empty results, adjust filters using references/query_fields.json and re-run) to raise workflow clarity toward a 5.
Trim the generic 'Output Contract' and 'Validation and Safety Rules' boilerplate to the GEO-specific points (e.g., output name geo_search_api_result.md, NCBI rate-limit/credential handling) so every line earns its place.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concrete usage examples, but the 'Key Features', 'Example Usage', 'Implementation Details', 'Required Inputs', and 'Recommended Workflow' sections restate the same generic scope/validate/produce guidance several times, adding padding that could be tightened, which fits the 3 anchor better than the lean 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands (python scripts/search_geo.py with concrete --filters and --limit examples), a real script with documented arguments, and a real reference file, matching the 5 anchor for copy-paste-ready coverage of common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced steps ('Recommended Workflow', 'Quick Validation', 'Validation and Safety Rules', 'Failure Handling') with validation before execution and early-stop on missing inputs; it is a read-only search rather than destructive/batch work, and the only minor gap is no explicit re-validate-after-error feedback loop, sitting at 4 just below the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with a SKILL.md overview pointing one level deep to real bundle files (scripts/search_geo.py and references/query_fields.json), both of which exist and are clearly signaled via links; minor organization gaps (some redundant inline guidance that could be trimmed) keep it just below the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |