interview-mock-partner

Simulates behavioral interview questions for medical professionals.

1.58x

Quality

27%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

98%

1.58x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./scientific-skills/Academic Writing/interview-mock-partner/SKILL.md

Quality

Discovery

32%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies a clear niche (behavioral interviews for medical professionals) but lacks the completeness needed for effective skill selection. It's missing explicit trigger guidance, specific actions beyond 'simulates', and natural keyword variations that users might employ when seeking this functionality.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause with trigger terms like 'interview practice', 'mock interview', 'behavioral questions', 'healthcare interview', 'nursing interview prep'

Expand specific actions: 'Generates behavioral interview questions, provides sample STAR-format answers, offers feedback on responses'

Include keyword variations for medical roles: 'healthcare workers, nurses, physicians, clinical staff, residency interviews'

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (behavioral interview questions, medical professionals) and implies the action (simulates), but doesn't list specific concrete actions like 'generates questions', 'provides feedback', 'scores responses', or 'offers sample answers'.	2 / 3
Completeness	Describes what it does (simulates behavioral interview questions) but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill.	1 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes relevant keywords like 'behavioral interview' and 'medical professionals', but misses common variations users might say such as 'mock interview', 'practice interview', 'healthcare', 'nursing', 'doctor interview prep', or 'STAR method'.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The combination of 'behavioral interview' and 'medical professionals' provides some specificity, but could overlap with general interview prep skills or medical education skills without clearer boundaries.	2 / 3
	Total	7 / 12 Passed

Implementation

22%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill is essentially a template shell with parameter definitions and boilerplate sections but lacks the core instructional content needed to actually perform medical interview simulations. It tells Claude what outputs to produce but provides no guidance on how to generate realistic behavioral questions, evaluate responses, or structure the mock interview interaction.

Suggestions

Add concrete examples of behavioral interview questions for different medical positions and experience levels (e.g., 'Tell me about a time you handled a difficult patient' with sample strong/weak responses)

Define a clear workflow for conducting the mock interview: how to present questions, how to evaluate user responses, what constitutes good feedback, and how to iterate

Remove boilerplate sections (Risk Assessment, Security Checklist, Lifecycle Status) that don't help Claude execute the skill and replace with actionable content

Include example dialogue showing a complete mock interview exchange with feedback, demonstrating the expected interaction pattern

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The skill includes substantial boilerplate (risk assessment tables, security checklists, evaluation criteria, lifecycle status) that adds little value for Claude executing this task. The core functionality could be conveyed in far fewer tokens.	2 / 3
Actionability	The skill provides no concrete examples of interview questions, no sample dialogue flow, no actual implementation of how to conduct the mock interview. It describes parameters and output format but gives no executable guidance on generating questions or providing feedback.	1 / 3
Workflow Clarity	There is no workflow described at all. The skill doesn't explain how to conduct the interview simulation - whether it's interactive, how to deliver questions, how to evaluate responses, or how the feedback loop works.	1 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The content is organized with clear sections and headers, but it's a single file with no references to additional resources. The structure exists but contains mostly template boilerplate rather than meaningful content organization.	2 / 3
	Total	6 / 12 Passed

Validation

90%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	10 / 11 Passed

Repository: aipoch/medical-research-skills
Commit: 4a48721

Reviewed: about 12 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.