Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete commands and a well-sequenced, checkpoint-gated workflow, but it is padded with verbatim description repetition and generic boilerplate, and its referenced files do not exist in the bundle.
Suggestions
Remove the verbatim description text duplicated in 'When to Use' and 'Key Features' — a short trigger summary suffices once the frontmatter description already covers it.
Either create the referenced bundle files (references/guide.md, references/examples/, references/audit-reference.md, scripts/main.py) or drop the references so navigation is not broken.
Trim generic boilerplate sections ('Output Requirements', 'Response Template', 'Input Validation') to the few lines that add IRB-specific value over what Claude already knows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly actionable, but the full description is pasted verbatim into both 'When to Use' and 'Key Features', and sections like 'Output Requirements', 'Response Template', and 'Implementation Details' add generic boilerplate that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands with concrete flags for each task, e.g. 'python scripts/main.py --task consent --protocol protocol.json --output consent_form.docx'. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Recommended Workflow' is a clear numbered sequence with explicit ⛔ checkpoints and feedback loops ('review errors → fix each issue → re-run → only proceed when zero blocking errors'). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are signaled one level deep ('references/guide.md', 'references/examples/', 'references/audit-reference.md'), but no bundle files actually exist and the body is largely a monolithic inline wall with repeated content. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |