Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-structured with good progressive disclosure and concrete budgets, but its actionability and workflow validation are held back by abstract LaTeX guidance and an unused bundled review script. Wiring the existing review_poster.sh into the workflow as a verification checkpoint would lift both dimensions.
Suggestions
Reference scripts/review_poster.sh explicitly as a validation step in the workflow so the bundled checker becomes a real verify gate.
Add a short concrete LaTeX snippet or template-wiring instruction (e.g., how to start from assets/tikzposter_template.tex) to make the assembly guidance executable rather than abstract.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body with no concept-explaining filler (no "what a poster is" padding) and every section earning its place; assumes Claude's competence throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete budgets ("300-800 words", "5-6 blocks", "2-4 bullets"), a 7-item output contract, and a literal refusal template, but LaTeX assembly guidance stays abstract with no executable code or copy-paste commands. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequenced workflow plus a final quality checklist exists, but validation is an implicit self-check rather than a hard verify gate, and the bundled scripts/review_poster.sh is never wired in as a checkpoint. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Overview points to real one-level-deep bundle assets (assets/*.tex, assets/poster_quality_checklist.md) as the implementation anchor, with content appropriately split and clearly signaled navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |