medical-cv-resume-builder

Use medical cv resume builder for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.

Quality

43%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./scientific-skills/Academic Writing/medical-cv-resume-builder/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

42%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body provides real executable entry points and a clear sequenced workflow with a fallback, but it is weighed down by generic templated boilerplate and thin, non-specific domain guidance. Reference material exists but is barely substantive.

Suggestions

Remove or move generic boilerplate (Risk Assessment, Security Checklist, Lifecycle Status, Evaluation Criteria) that does not advance CV-building, to tighten conciseness.

Replace the bare 'Features' list with concrete formatting rules and examples (section order, citation style, achievement phrasing) so the guidance is actionable.

Flesh out references/guidelines.md with real US medical CV standards and link to it by name from the body, or drop the reference if it adds no value.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is padded with templated boilerplate (Risk Assessment, Security Checklist, Lifecycle Status, Evaluation Criteria, Output Requirements) and repeats the description verbatim in 'When to Use'/'Key Features', adding generic process guidance Claude already knows, matching anchor 2.	2 / 5
Actionability	Real executable commands (py_compile, running scripts/main.py) and a concrete input/output schema exist, but the core domain guidance ('Medical CV formatting', 'Achievement highlighting') is list-only with no specifics and main.py is a minimal toy, matching anchor 3.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A 5-step workflow with an explicit fallback loop and a Quick Check command is present, but validation checkpoints are largely implicit/abstract ('Validate that the request matches the documented scope'), matching anchor 3.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	A one-level-deep bundle exists (references/guidelines.md, scripts/main.py) and is generically signaled, but guidelines.md is a near-empty placeholder, references are not named or specifically linked, and much boilerplate is inlined, matching anchor 3.	3 / 5
	Total	11 / 20 Passed

Description

45%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description names its domain but relies on abstract process language rather than concrete CV-building actions or natural trigger phrases, leaving both the 'what' and 'when' weakly specified. It is only marginally distinct from generic academic-writing skills.

Suggestions

Lead with concrete actions, e.g. 'Builds and formats medical CVs and resumes following US academic standards, organizing education, experience, and achievements into sections.'

Add explicit natural trigger phrases such as 'Use when the user needs a medical CV, physician resume, or curriculum vitae for academic or clinical applications.'

Replace abstract qualities ('structured execution, explicit assumptions') with the specific deliverable the skill produces.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain ('medical cv resume', 'academic writing') but the only 'actions' are abstract process qualities ('structured execution, explicit assumptions, clear output boundaries') with no concrete CV-building verbs, matching anchor 2.	2 / 5
Completeness	The 'what' is only a weak restatement of the skill name ('Use medical cv resume builder') and the 'when' ('for academic writing workflows that need...') is abstract rather than a concrete trigger phrase, matching anchor 3.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Contains natural terms 'CV', 'resume', and 'academic writing', but misses common synonyms such as 'curriculum vitae', 'physician resume', or 'job application', matching anchor 3.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The medical CV niche is somewhat distinctive, but the generic 'academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions...' framing overlaps broadly with other academic-writing skills, matching anchor 3.	3 / 5
	Total	11 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: aipoch/medical-research-skills
Path: scientific-skills/Academic Writing/medical-cv-resume-builder/SKILL.md
Commit: 63c61d3

Reviewed: 13 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.