Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured analytical skill with a clear sequenced workflow, an explicit self-validation step, a mandatory output template, and clean one-level-deep reference navigation. Its main weakness is redundancy across the three negative-guidance sections, which inflates length without adding information.
Suggestions
Consolidate the duplicated negative-guidance: merge 'Core Function: This skill should not', 'What This Skill Should Not Do', and the prohibitions in 'Hard Rules' into a single authoritative list to remove triplicated content.
For Steps 4–7, add a one-line concrete decision cue per gap class (e.g. a defining question) so the classification and upgrade steps read as procedure rather than category labels.
Trim the 'Quality Standard' section, which restates the Core Function and output expectations already specified earlier, to recover token budget.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and avoids generic concept explanations, but the negative-behavior guidance is repeated across 'Core Function: This skill should not', 'What This Skill Should Not Do', and 'Hard Rules', adding noticeable redundancy that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it gives concrete, specific guidance — an 8-step process, per-step sub-bullets, and a mandatory A–I output structure — but a few steps remain at the level of category labels (e.g. 'design gap, bias-control gap') rather than fully specified procedure. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The eight steps are explicitly sequenced ('always run in order') and Step 8 is a self-critical review checkpoint that serves as a validation/feedback loop before finalizing, satisfying the explicit-checkpoint anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that points to seven real, one-level-deep reference files, each clearly signaled with the exact sections it applies to (e.g. 'use when classifying method gaps in Sections C–F'), and all referenced paths verified to exist. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |