Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered CLI skill body: fully executable commands, a complete argument/error reference, clear scope boundaries, and proper deferral of detail to one-level-deep reference files. Weaknesses are minor: development-artifact noise (checklist, version stamp, historical-output note), a missing explicit output-verification checkpoint, and one dangling script reference (scripts/install_dependencies.R).
Suggestions
Remove the Implementation Checklist, the 'Last updated/Version' footer, and the 'Historical development artifacts may still exist in tests/output/' note — they are development metadata, not usage guidance, and version/date info belongs in a changelog or deprecated section.
Add an explicit post-build verification step to the Workflow (e.g., 'After build, confirm data/Nomogram_list.qs and table/nomogram_c_index.xlsx exist before running plot mode') to close the checkpoint gap.
Fix the dangling reference: either include scripts/install_dependencies.R in the bundle or replace the bootstrap-installer line with only the direct install.packages() command.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with tables and executable commands and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows (no primer on Cox models or nomograms). Not 5: the Implementation Checklist, the "Last updated: 2026-04-27 | Version: 2.1.0" line, and the "Historical development artifacts may still exist in tests/output/" note are development metadata that spend tokens without guiding usage, and the version/date info is not placed in a changelog/deprecated section. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every workflow is given as complete, copy-paste-ready Rscript commands with all flags (build, plot, smoke test), backed by a full argument table with types and defaults, an example CSV, and executable dependency installation. Not 4: the examples cover the common cases (basic build, custom prediction horizons, re-plot of an existing bundle) with no gaps in key details. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step Workflow is clearly sequenced with validation as an explicit Step 1, and the Error Handling table plus "IF error persists, READ: references/troubleshooting.md" provides a real feedback loop, so the batch-operation validation cap does not apply. Not 5: the workflow narrates the script's internals rather than prescribing an explicit post-run verification checkpoint (e.g., confirm data/Nomogram_list.qs exists before plot mode). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The "When to Read External Files" table cleanly signals one-level-deep references (references/algorithm.md, references/cli-guide.md, references/troubleshooting.md all exist as advertised), and details are appropriately deferred. Not 5: "Rscript scripts/install_dependencies.R" references a file absent from the bundle's scripts/ directory, the Arguments and Error Handling tables partially duplicate references/cli-guide.md, and tests/ paths referenced in Testing cannot be verified in the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |