Content
50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body contains a genuinely solid core — executable usage commands, a complete parameter table, and clear input format documentation — but it is buried in generic auto-generated governance boilerplate that nearly doubles its length, includes self-contradictory dependency information, and inlines content that belongs in the existing references/ file which is never actually named. The description/body mismatch (a phylogenetics tool described as generic 'data analysis') compounds the noise.
Suggestions
Cut the template boilerplate (Key Features, Implementation Details, Output Requirements, Response Template, Inputs to Collect, Output Contract, Risk Assessment, Security Checklist, Lifecycle Status, Evaluation Criteria) and keep only tree-specific guidance, resolving the Prerequisites/Dependencies contradiction.
Name and link the actual reference file: 'Before running, follow [runtime_checklist.md](references/runtime_checklist.md)' instead of the generic 'references/ contains supporting rules' gesture.
Fix the 'Audit-Ready Commands' section: the --input example passes a prose sentence and --format json, which contradicts the documented Newick-file input and png/pdf/svg output; replace with a real invocation like 'python scripts/main.py -i tree.nwk -o tree_audit.png'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Roughly half the body is template padding unrelated to tree styling: circular filler sections ('See `## Features` above', 'See `## Usage` above', 'See `## Workflow` above'), generic governance boilerplate (Response Template, Output Contract, Inputs to Collect, Lifecycle Status, Risk Assessment), and a direct contradiction ('## Prerequisites: No additional Python packages required' vs. '## Dependencies: ete3, matplotlib, numpy, pandas'). It is noticeably verbose with several padded sections (anchor 2) rather than only minor trimmable excess (anchor 3). | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | The Usage, Parameters, Examples, taxonomy CSV format, and Newick input sections are concrete and copy-paste ready ('python3 scripts/main.py -i tree.nwk -o tree_bootstrap.png --show-bootstrap --bootstrap-threshold 70'). Not score 5 because the 'Audit-Ready Commands' example passes a prose string as --input with --format json, contradicting the documented Newick-input/png-pdf-svg-output interface, and the Quick Check assumes an undocumented working directory ('cd "20260318/scientific-skills/..."'). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step 'Workflow' is a generic template (validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, produce a bounded deliverable) rather than tree-specific operations, and the 'Example run plan' is likewise abstract. The py_compile Quick Check supplies one real checkpoint, but there is no fix-and-retry feedback loop and no validation of the actual output image, matching anchor 3's 'sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit'. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The bundle has scripts/main.py and references/runtime_checklist.md, but the body only gestures generically ('Reference material available in `references/`', '`references/` contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists') — it never names runtime_checklist.md or signals what is inside it, and substantial inline boilerplate (security checklist, lifecycle status) belongs in a separate reference. This matches anchor 3: references present but not clearly signaled and content that should be separate is inline. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |