Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is highly actionable with executable commands, clear templates, and well-sequenced workflows including user-confirmation checkpoints. It is somewhat verbose and entirely self-contained, so progressive disclosure and token efficiency are the weakest dimensions.
Suggestions
Tighten the body by consolidating the duplicated guidance about L-N. numbering, which currently appears in Execution Order, Phase 4, and the sequenced-project section.
Extract the issue-type templates and label/source tables into a referenced file (e.g. references/templates.md) so the main SKILL.md stays a lean overview.
Trim the longest sections (Phase 3 splitting heuristics, the L-N. opt-in rules) to the essential rules; the team-format rationale is repeated across several sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is accurate and well-organized but long (~470 lines); some sections restate guidance across Modes, Execution Order, Phase 4, and Labeling Convention, which could be tightened to respect the context budget. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready CLI commands (linear issue create/update with exact flags), mktemp description-file patterns, save_issue relationship examples, and complete fill-in templates for each issue type. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step Create (Phase 1-5) and Improve workflows are explicitly sequenced with confirmation checkpoints ('Let them adjust before you create anything'), a renumber diff review step, and validation-style gates before destructive title changes. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is monolithically inline in SKILL.md with no bundle files in references/scripts/assets; the L-N numbering, labeling, and template material could be split into referenced files to ease navigation, though sections are clearly headed. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |