Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is maximally concise and actionable for a single-command skill, but it performs a batch build with no verification of success, which caps workflow clarity. Adding an explicit check that the build succeeded (and ideally artifact location) would raise the workflow score.
Suggestions
Add a verification step after the build, e.g. check the exit code or confirm generated .wasm artifacts exist in artifacts/ or target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/.
State where build artifacts are output so downstream steps can locate them.
Note expected failure handling (e.g. re-run on failure, report compiler errors) to turn the batch build into a feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | A single lean sentence gives one executable command and its location with no padding or over-explanation; every token earns its place, matching the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | "execute [make build-contracts] from the project root directory" is copy-paste-ready, fully executable, and specifies the working directory; for a single-purpose skill this covers the common case per the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Building "all" contracts is a batch operation and the workflow has no validation/verification step (e.g. confirm the build succeeded, check artifacts), so workflow clarity is capped at 3 per the batch-operation guideline. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references and is organized under a single clear section, qualifying for the simple-skill exception to score 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |