Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable design-consultant workflow with concrete commands and a clear phased sequence. Its main weakness is a couple of validation gaps in the parallel demo-generation step and some non-essential branding content.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verify-before-present checkpoint in Phase 3.5: confirm each agent's HTML/screenshot was generated successfully before showing all three to the user, with a retry path on failure.
Trim the promotional footer (花叔出品 / 粉丝数 / 代表作) and the abstract Core Principles aphorisms, keeping only the constraints that change Claude's behavior.
For the Phase 5 AI-prompt structure, include one fully copy-paste-ready example prompt (with hex codes, ratios, and output spec filled in) rather than only the structural template.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, tabular, mostly action-oriented content that assumes Claude's competence, with only minor trim-able flourish (the Core Principles aphorisms and the promotional 花叔 footer). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (Playwright screenshot, _temp/design-demos/ naming, hex codes, icon libraries, prompt structure, 0-10 critique rubric) with only minor gaps in fully copy-paste-ready code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Phase 1-7 sequence with explicit feedback loops (Phase 4 selection/iterate/restart) and critique-based verification; minor gap is the lack of an explicit verify-before-present checkpoint for the parallel demo-generation batch. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clean overview in SKILL.md with a References Library table that signals each file's content and read timing, and all three referenced files exist as one-level-deep, non-nested references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |