Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, reasonably actionable instruction-only skill: concrete naming conventions, a save template, and a clear execution flow. It is held back by redundant sections (核心功能 vs 执行流程), off-topic branding padding, a stale date, and the absence of any post-save validation or index-entry format.
Suggestions
Merge 核心功能 and 执行流程 into a single section to remove the duplicated identify/extract/save/index steps, and drop the author-branding trailer and "最后更新" line.
Add a validation checkpoint after saving (e.g., confirm the file exists in the expected category directory and verify the INDEX.md entry) to close the workflow-clarity gap.
Specify the INDEX.md entry format (columns/fields for 标题、分类、标签、文件名) and how the auto-increment 序号 is determined, and inline or summarize the rules currently delegated to /Prompt梳理/CLAUDE.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | "核心功能" and "执行流程" repeat the same identify/extract/save/index steps, the five-category count is stated twice, and the trailer ("花叔出品 | 公众号「花叔」| 30万+粉丝 | 代表作：小猫补光灯...") plus "最后更新: 2025-11-07" add padding and time-sensitive noise — mostly efficient but with several unnecessary repeated or padded sections. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance is present: the naming pattern "prompt-[自动递增序号]-[简短标题].md", the target directory "/Prompt梳理/[分类]/", a full save-format template, and the INDEX.md update step; minor gaps remain since the INDEX.md entry format and the auto-increment mechanism are unspecified. Not a 5 because those key details are missing. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | "执行流程" lists a clear five-step sequence (识别类型→提取信息→生成文件名→保存文件→更新索引) with one explicit checkpoint ("如果分类不明确，询问用户意图"), but there is no validation that the file was saved correctly or that the INDEX.md entry was added — checkpoints beyond the ambiguity check are missing or implicit, matching the anchor for 'steps listed but validation gaps'. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body is organized into clear, well-scoped sections (何时使用、分类规则表、保存格式、执行流程、注意事项) with one clearly signaled external pointer ("/Prompt梳理/CLAUDE.md - Prompt管理规则") — good structure with a minor gap, since the referenced management rules are not inlined or summarized, leaving a small dependency outside the skill. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |