Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is strongly actionable with a clear three-pass workflow and concrete checklists/examples. It loses points on conciseness from duplicated examples and a marketing footer, and on progressive disclosure because it is a long monolithic document with no bundle-file offloading.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated before/after examples: keep them only in the 6-category taxonomy and drop the redundant 常见错误与改写示例 section (or vice versa), and delete the non-task marketing footer to reclaim tokens.
Split the detailed 素材库 usage and full example banks into reference bundle files under references/, keeping SKILL.md a lean overview that links to them one level deep.
Tighten the 审校工具 and 成功案例 sections to essential guidance, or move them to a reference file, to improve token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly useful domain guidance, but ~300 lines with duplicated before/after examples (the same Claude Code rewrites appear in both the 6-category taxonomy and 常见错误与改写示例) and a non-task marketing footer ('30万+粉丝', '代表作…') that could be trimmed; not a 1 because it avoids explaining basic concepts Claude already knows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Highly actionable for an instruction skill: per-pass checkbox checklists, a concrete 6-category AI-flavor taxonomy with ❌/✅ rewrites, specific rewrite heuristics ('超过30字的拆成2-3句'), and a copy-paste-ready Grep invocation (pattern/path/output_mode/-n) for the 素材库. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced three-pass process (内容审校 → 风格审校 → 细节打磨) plus a 最终检查 validation read-through, each with its own checklist and method; the final read-through-and-rewrite loop serves as the validation checkpoint. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with headers and one-level external references in 参考资源, but it is a large monolithic SKILL.md (~300 lines) with no bundle files and substantial content (detailed examples, 素材库 usage) kept inline that could be split out; above 1 due to clear structure, below 3 due to lack of one-level-deep bundle references and inline redundancy. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |