Conciseness

The core workflow and templates are tight, but the promotional footer ("花叔出品 | 公众号「花叔」| 30万+粉丝 … 代表作：小猫补光灯…") and the bare "最后更新: 2026-02-06" date are padding and time-sensitive content that earn no tokens. This matches anchor 3 (mostly efficient, some content to trim) rather than 4.

Actionability

Concrete file path pattern (`_knowledge_base/research-<主题>-<YYYYMMDD>.md`), copy-ready note and briefing templates, and an explicit cadence ("每完成3次搜索…保存一次「阶段摘要」") give mostly executable guidance. It misses anchor 5 because the source-priority rule is delegated to SHARED-RULES.md, which is not present in the skill bundle, leaving a key detail unverifiable.

Workflow Clarity

A clear 4-step sequence (create file → search and append → phase summaries → final briefing) with a periodic checkpoint and a "待确认问题" verification section. It matches anchor 4 rather than 5 because there is no explicit error-recovery or review loop, though the task is neither destructive nor batch so no cap applies.

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well organized in a single reasonably short file, but the only external reference ("遵循信息源优先级（见 SHARED-RULES.md）") does not resolve within the skill — no references/ or bundle file exists. This matches anchor 3 (references present but not clearly verifiable) rather than 4.

Specificity

The description names the domain ("结构化网络调研流程") and 1-2 concrete mechanisms ("增量保存到文件", "不因会话截断丢失"), but does not enumerate the actual actions performed (create research file, append findings, phase summaries, final briefing). It sits at anchor 3 rather than 4 because several specific actions are missing.

Completeness

Both parts are present: an explicit when-clause ("当用户说…时使用此技能") with concrete trigger phrases, and a what-clause. It matches anchor 4 rather than 5 because the "what" ("结构化网络调研流程") is high-level and could list the concrete deliverables more specifically.

Trigger Term Quality

Five natural user phrases ("调研", "搜索资料", "帮我查一下", "了解一下", "最新信息") give good keyword coverage with meaningful variation. It falls short of anchor 5 because common phrasings such as "查资料" or "搜索一下" are not covered.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The persistence-focused research niche is fairly distinct from typical skills, but triggers like "了解一下" and "帮我查一下" are broad enough to fire on non-research information requests. This matches anchor 3 (somewhat specific, still overlapping with similar skills) rather than 4.