Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, actionable research workflow with concrete templates, clear sequencing, and good organization. Its only blemish is unnecessary non-functional token spend in the promotional footer and a self-dated update line.
Suggestions
Remove the promotional author footer (公众号/粉丝/代表作) — it is irrelevant to the skill's function and wastes tokens.
Replace or drop the hardcoded "最后更新: 2026-02-06" date, which will age; move any versioning into a separate changelog if needed.
Either supply the referenced SHARED-RULES.md or remove the in-body pointer to it so there are no dangling references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body itself is lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the off-topic promo footer (公众号/粉丝/AppStore 排名) and a time-sensitive "最后更新" date add tokens that don't serve the skill's function. | 2.5 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete file paths, copy-paste-ready markdown templates for both the running notes and the final briefing, and specific cadence rules (e.g. "每完成3次搜索保存一次阶段摘要"). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced four-step workflow (create file → search & save → stage summary → final briefing) with an explicit cadence checkpoint; this is a non-destructive research task so heavy validation loops are not required. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short single-purpose skill (~95 lines) with well-organized sections and no genuine need for external references; the one dangling reference to SHARED-RULES.md is minor since the inline content is self-contained. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11.5 / 12 Passed |