Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, actionable skill body that gives concrete rewrite patterns and a clear three-pass workflow. The main improvement areas are tighter feedback loops and converting personal reference paths into clearly signaled bundle files.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation feedback loop for the polish pass (e.g., re-read aloud after each rewrite and confirm no remaining 书面语 before moving on) to strengthen workflow_clarity.
Replace external personal paths (/写作参考/...) with actual bundled reference files in ./references/ and link them clearly so progressive_disclosure navigation is verifiable.
Trim the opening restatement line ('让视频脚本更适合实际录制，强化口语感，去掉书面语和AI味。') since it duplicates the description and the 核心目标 section already covers it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence with minimal padding, though the opening line lightly restates the description and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully actionable guidance: concrete before/after rewrite pairs, specific word lists to add/remove, a measurable rule (短句不超过20字), and a copy-paste-ready example covering the common case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-pass sequenced checklist with checkboxes and a validation checkpoint ('大声读一遍，卡顿的地方重写'), though feedback loops are light and not destructive-capped. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with a references list, but the referenced paths are external/personal locations rather than navigable bundle files, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |