Content
51%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and well-sequenced with checklists, but it is overly verbose and fails progressive disclosure: nearly everything is inlined in SKILL.md and the only "references" are external absolute paths with no actual bundle files.
Suggestions
Move the large formula/example tables and detailed 承接脚本 into bundled reference files under ./references/ and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with one-level-deep links.
Trim redundant restatements (e.g. the 避免类型 and 常见错误 tables repeat the checklist) to respect the token budget.
Replace external absolute paths in 参考资源 with bundled, relative reference files so navigation is real and self-contained.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is noticeably verbose (~400 lines) with extensive examples, tables, checklists and explanatory commentary that restates obvious points; much could be tightened or moved to reference files. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, usable guidance — 5 named title formulas with formats/examples, thumbnail criteria, a承接 structure with sample scripts and a full checklist — with only minor gaps in executable specificity. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 完整检查流程 sequences the three checks as Step 1–4 with sub-steps and a final 综合评估 checklist; it lacks an explicit validate/retry feedback loop but the workflow is clear and checklist-driven. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is essentially a monolithic inline body with two 参考资源 paths that point to absolute filesystem locations outside the bundle rather than to bundled reference files; no references/scripts/assets bundle exists, and detailed material that should be split out is inlined. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |