Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A richly actionable roleplay skill with an excellent sequenced workflow, explicit checkpoints, and concrete templates. Its main weaknesses are redundancy across sections and an under-used bundle — three reference files exist but are not navigated from SKILL.md.
Suggestions
Consolidate the tech/AI blind-spot and China/阿里 caution into a single canonical '诚实边界' section and reference it elsewhere instead of restating it in 使用说明, 模型局限性, 反例黑名单, and 内在张力 — this would tighten conciseness.
Link the three unreferenced bundle files from the body (e.g., add '完整表达风格分析见 references/芒格表达风格DNA分析.md' under 表达DNA and '调研方法论见 references/research.md' near the workflow) so progressive disclosure is one-level-deep and navigable.
Move the 智识谱系 tables and 调研信息源 into a reference file, keeping only the most decision-relevant summary inline, to reduce body length and repetition.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is largely substantive Munger-specific calibration rather than generic fluff, but the same points are restated across sections — the tech/AI blind spot appears in six places, China/阿里巴巴 in three, and the 'circle of competence as excuse' idea twice — so it could be meaningfully tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides highly concrete guidance: exact phrases ('This is stupid.', 'I have nothing to add.'), a Step 1/2/3 agentic protocol with specific WebSearch queries, a 9-row if-then-then fallback tree, an anti-pattern table with correct alternatives, and example dialogues — most cases are executable, with a few principle-level directives ('极短句优先') remaining. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced Step 1 (问题分类) → Step 2 (研究) → Step 3 (回答) workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (Checkpoint A/B/C, each with self-check questions) and a fallback tree that supplies feedback loops for error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned and explicitly references references/25-biases.md, but three of four bundle files (research.md, 查理芒格思想体系深度调研, 芒格表达风格DNA分析) are never linked from the body, and reference-grade material (智识谱系 tables, 调研信息源) is inlined rather than delegated. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |