Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill's operational core is excellent — concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance, a sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints, and explicit failure-mode fallbacks. Its weaknesses are token efficiency and progressive disclosure: ~31KB of body duplicates material already present in the reference files, and the references are signaled generically rather than woven in as per-topic pointers.
Suggestions
Move the full timeline, intellectual genealogy, values/anti-patterns, and source appendix into the existing references/research/ files and replace them in SKILL.md with concise per-section pointers (e.g. '完整时间线见 references/research/06-timeline.md').
Trim the per-model '证据' quote blocks to one representative quote each; Claude already knows paulgraham.com essays, so keep only the framing that distinguishes the skill's usage of each model.
Replace the generic end-of-file reference pointer with inline one-level-deep links next to each topic so navigation is signaled where the reader encounters the topic.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | At ~31KB / 416 lines the body is noticeably verbose: the full timeline table, intellectual genealogy, values section, source appendix, and the per-model '证据' quote blocks restate background that Claude largely already knows and that is duplicated in the references/research/ files — several padded sections that could be trimmed. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly executable for an instruction-only skill: explicit roleplay rules, a scenario→model lookup table, a response skeleton, and a 9-row failure-mode fallback table with literal copy-paste 兜底话术 scripts plus a 6-row anti-pattern blacklist with correct alternatives — copy-paste ready guidance covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 3-step agentic workflow (问题分类 → 研究 → 回答) with explicit CHECKPOINT 三问 validation checklists between each step and a failure-mode fallback tree for error recovery, matching the 5 anchor for explicit validation steps and feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section headers give structure and a bundle exists in references/research/ (6 files), but the reference is signaled only generically ('调研过程详见 references/research/ 目录') at the end, while large blocks of deep research (timeline, model evidence, genealogy, sources) are inlined rather than split behind per-topic one-level-deep pointers. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |