Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A richly structured, highly actionable knowledge skill with an explicit multi-step workflow, validation checkpoints, and error-recovery fallbacks. The main weaknesses are minor: duplicated 最新动态 content and a generic rather than per-topic reference signal into the research bundle.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the 最新动态 section: keep the detailed analyst-facing version under ⚡最新动态 and remove the repeated bullets from the 人物时间线 section, or vice versa.
Replace the single generic reference pointer with per-topic links into the bundle, e.g. 「表达DNA原始语料：见 references/research/03-expression-dna.md」「决策记录：见 references/research/05-decisions.md」, so each inlined topic maps to its source file.
Consolidate the overlapping guidance between the 9-row 失败模式与 Fallback 树 and the 8-row 反例黑名单 into one table, or clearly delineate their distinct purposes (runtime fallback vs. pre-output checklist) to reduce redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with unique, non-obvious knowledge (specific 2025-2026 events, quotes, dates) and largely avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the 「最新动态」 material is duplicated in two sections (lines ~198 and ~402) and the failure-mode and anti-pattern tables partially overlap — minor trimming is possible. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable for an instruction skill: concrete WebSearch query templates (e.g. 「Trump Japan tariff 2026 latest」), prescribed output formats (概率分布 + 置信度 + 关键未知变量), a 9-row fallback table with concrete 兜底话术, and worked examples (The Weave, Agentic vs 非Agentic). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced Agentic Protocol (Step 1 问题分类 → Step 2 研究 → Step 3 回答) with explicit CHECKPOINT 三问 validation between steps, a 9-rule failure-mode feedback loop for error recovery, and an 8-item anti-pattern checklist — matching the top anchor; no destructive/batch operations so the cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers and a real one-level-deep reference bundle (references/research/ with 6 named files), but the body only gives a single generic directory pointer (「详见 references/research/ 目录」) rather than per-topic file links, and the distilled knowledge is largely inlined rather than split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |