CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

x-mastery-mentor

$10K/hr级X/Twitter运营导师。基于Nicolas Cole、Dickie Bush、Sahil Bloom、Justin Welsh、 Dan Koe、Alex Hormozi六位顶级创作者的方法论 + X开源算法深度分析 + AI/科技赛道专精策略, 提炼6个核心心智模型、10条决策启发式、完整的选题-写作-增长操作手册。 通用方法论为底座,AI/科技赛道为专精。 当用户提到「X运营」「推特」「Twitter」「怎么写推文」「怎么涨粉」「X策略」「推特选题」「tweet」「thread」「X算法」时使用。 即使用户只是说「这条推文怎么写」「帮我想个X内容」「推特增长」「发推」「write a tweet」「X account」「grow on X」也应触发。

72

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is x-mastery-mentor in alchaincyf/x-mentor-skill

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-architected instruction skill with crisp scenario workflows, strong validation checkpoints, and clean progressive disclosure to verified reference files. Its main weakness is conciseness: several rules are repeated across the scenario steps, the STOP checkpoints, and the blacklist table.

Suggestions

Consolidate the repeated rules across the scenario steps, the STOP checkpoint section, and the 反例黑名单 table into a single canonical source to reduce token overlap.

Move the full worked 微例 (baseline → round1) into a reference file and keep only one compact inline example per scenario in SKILL.md.

Trim the 诚实边界 and 用户数据持久化 sections to the essential bullets; the detailed file schema already lives in references/quality-analytics.md.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Content is dense and domain-specific (algorithm rules, hook formulas) rather than explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the scenario steps, the STOP checkpoint section, and the 反例黑名单 table restate overlapping rules, so it could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

Highly executable guidance throughout: named hook formulas, specific character limits (120-130), concrete weekly action plans (周一/周三/周五), tool fallback chains, and before/after worked examples that cover the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Each scenario (A-E) is a numbered multi-step sequence with explicit 【检查点】 gates, plus a STOP section of mandatory pre-output questions and a failure-mode/fallback tree providing clear validation and error-recovery loops.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A routing table maps problem types to specific reference files, a stated load-only-what-you-need principle governs them, and a Reference索引 table lists each real file with content and line counts; references are one level deep with the research archive clearly demarcated.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

95%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that pairs a clear capability statement with extensive bilingual trigger phrases. It fully satisfies the what/when requirements and is highly distinct, with only minor under-enumeration of concrete actions keeping specificity off the top anchor.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the X/Twitter运营 domain plus several concrete deliverables ('6个核心心智模型、10条决策启发式、完整的选题-写作-增长操作手册'), but does not enumerate the full action set (诊断、审阅、变现) as explicitly as the body does, leaving minor gaps.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('$10K/hr级X/Twitter运营导师...操作手册') and when ('当用户提到...时使用','即使用户只是说...也应触发') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive coverage of natural trigger phrases in both Chinese and English ('X运营','怎么写推文','怎么涨粉','tweet','thread','write a tweet','grow on X'), including synonyms and casual phrasings users would actually say.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (X/Twitter运营 with AI/科技赛道专精) and distinctive platform-specific triggers make overlap with other skills minimal.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 6 deeper-than-1-level

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
alchaincyf/nuwa-skill
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.