Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete CLI commands and clearly sequenced hook/workflows, and it stays lean by explaining only skill-specific concepts. The main gap is the absence of explicit validation checkpoints after destructive consolidation and the lack of any external reference files for a complex skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and information-rich, explaining only skill-specific concepts (fatigue, haziness) rather than general ones Claude already knows; minor padding in the three-layer defense prose. Not 5 because a few sections (post-compaction narrative, ingestion details) could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready CLI block, a concrete numbered hook sequence, and specific commands like 'mnemos add goal "..." --task-id session-1' covering the common cases. Not below 5 because the guidance is fully executable. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered sequences (hooks 1-7, three-layer recovery, 5-step agent workflow) with the fatigue-state table acting as a monitoring feedback loop. Not 5 because there is no explicit validate-after-consolidation checkpoint for the evicting/compressing operations; not 3 because the fatigue thresholds supply checkpoints. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the single SKILL.md is well-sectioned with one-level-deep structure and clear navigation. Not 5 because a skill this complex inlines fatigue/ingestion/iCPG detail that could live in separate reference files; not 3 because organization is genuinely good. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |