Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured skill body: executable commands cover the full workflow, the pre-flight bot-access step is a genuine checkpoint, and progressive disclosure is exemplary with all referenced files present and clearly described. The main cost is token efficiency — the SEO-vs-AEO conceptual comparison and the Trigger Phrases section add tokens without adding operational value.
Suggestions
Trim the 'Distinct From SEO' section to the table alone (or move it into references/aeo_vs_seo.md, which already covers the topic) — Claude already understands the SEO/AEO distinction, so the prose explanation is padding.
Remove the 'Trigger Phrases' section — it duplicates the frontmatter description, which is the correct home for trigger guidance.
Add a closing validation step to the workflow (e.g., re-run aeo_audit.py on the optimized output and confirm the composite score improved before publishing) to create a validate→fix→retry feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The "Distinct From SEO" comparison table plus follow-up prose re-explains a conceptual distinction Claude already knows, and the "Trigger Phrases" section duplicates the frontmatter description. Mostly efficient elsewhere, but multiple sections are trimmable — matching anchor 3 rather than 4; not 2 because there is no tutorial padding and the operational sections earn their tokens. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The workflow gives copy-paste-ready commands for every common case ("python3 scripts/aeo_audit.py --url ...", "--mode balanced --output post-aeo.md", "citation_tracker.py --action add --llm perplexity"), plus a concrete report format and an industry-flag example. Matches anchor 5: fully executable guidance covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered 0–4 sequence with per-step commands and expected outputs, including a real pre-flight checkpoint ("a blocked GPTBot/PerplexityBot/ClaudeBot/Google-Extended is the first fix, always"). Not 5 because there is no validate→fix→retry loop (e.g., re-audit after optimizing to confirm the score improved); not 3 because checkpoints are explicit, not implicit, and operations are non-destructive. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The References section signals each of the 5 bundle files with a one-line content description, all verified to exist, one level deep with no nested references; detailed methodology is properly split out while the body stays an operational overview. Matches anchor 5; not 4 because references are clearly signaled and the split is appropriate — the inline tables are quick-reference material used directly in the workflow. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |